In a judgment that will cheer landlords fighting legal battles to evict
tenants, the Bombay High Court has held that a home-owner is the â€œbest
judgeâ€ when it comes to ascertaining whether he needs rented premises
for his own use. â€œThe court cannot prescribe for the landlord the
standard of living,â€ the court said while upholding a recent eviction
Under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act of 1947 (also known as the Rent Act), a landlord can evict a tenant if he can prove that he needs the premises for his personal use.
In the case, tenants Sara and Joe Rauf, who occupied the first floor of a two-storey house on Church Road in Pune, had moved the high court against a lower courtâ€™s order to vacate the premises. The lower court had upheld landlord Durgadas Shroffâ€™s (who died during the pendency of appeal) contention that he had three sons with their families, and needed more space. The Shroffs lived on the ground floor of the house.
Raufâ€™s counsel argued in the high court that apart from this house, the Shroffs had other three premises, though all of them were not available to them because of litigation. But Justice D B Bhosale, in his judgment last week, held that as the Shroffs could not currently use these premises, they could not be taken into consideration for deciding if they needed the Church Road house.
Every time an offender stealthily leaves India to take refuge in another country, the Government of India starts all over again with its strategy of bringing him back to the nation to make him stan More
Helplinelaw can set up your session with quality and experienced lawyers to discuss and resolve your legal matters. You can avail consultation in form of sending questions, phone call or webchat discussion More