Home | Members Login | Members Sign up | Tell a Friend | Contact Us | Lawyers Login
 
REQUEST A LAWYERREQUEST ONLINE LEGAL HELP
(Click, for online assistance)
(10:00 AM to 5:00 PM)
(In your area for your legal help) (On your legal issue by one of our experts)
News Home       New Delhi-Mumbai-Bangalore-Chennai-Ahmedabad-Pune-Hyderabad-Vodorada-Coimbetore-Kolkata etc.

Archives

News 2007
News 2006

             Home

  Gateway to India
  Global Connections
  Consultation
  
New Laws
  Legal Helpline
  Drafts & Deeds
  Bare Acts
  Indian Law Made Easy

Indian Law Made Easy

Business/Commercial Law
Consumer Rights
Property & Real Estate
Criminal Law
Tax Laws
Marriage & Divorce
Corporate Law
Inheritance
Intellectual Property
Environmental Law
Labour Law
Adoption


INDIA BUSINESS WORLD SEPTEMBER (1st - 15th) 2007
The Month that was ...


LOSSES NOT DEDUCTIBLE UNDER SEC 80HHC, SAYS SUPREME COURT

THE Supreme Court has said that an assessee cannot claim deduction under Section 80-HHC of the I-T Act for losses suffered on transactions. The apex court ruled that the meaning of profits under the provision of the Act would not include losses. Even if there are losses, they have to be ignored for the beneficiary purpose of such deduction, it added.

A bench comprising justices Arijit Pasayat and DK Jain said: "The term profit in section 80-HHC both in subsection (1) and sub-section (3) mean a positive profit worked out after taking into consideration the losses, if any." The court said the meaning of the word profit will depend on the context in which it is used. In section 80-HHC (1), it is admittedly used to indicate positive profit. Section 80-HHC (3) provides how profits are to be worked out in computing total income. For the purpose of such computation, both profits and losses have to be taken into account. Thus the word profit in section 80-HHC (3) will mean profits after taking losses, if any, into account, the court ruled.

Appellant AM Moosa had claimed deduction under section 80-HHC of the IT Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1992-93 but the assessing officer disallowed such claim on the ground that the profits of the business computed under section 80-HHC had indicated a negative figure. The assessee then moved the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Cochin, which dismissed the plea. The assessee then approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which affirmed the orders of the assessing officer and CIT (A). Later, on a reference of the assessee, the tribunal referred the case to the Kerala High Court. The reference was awarded in favour of the department.

The assessee then appealed in the apex court arguing that the word profit in section 80-HHC must have the same meaning in the entire section in which it falls. As the meaning of word profit in section 80-HHC(1) means only positive profit, it will have the same meaning in section 80-HHC(3)(C), the assessee had said.

The court, rejecting the plea, said the interpretation of the provision has to be in accordance with the words used.

Identify your Lawyer/ Advocate for legal services in India

Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Bangalore, Baroda, Chandigarh, Chennai, Coimbatore, Cochin, Delhi, Goa, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Gaziabad, Noida, Gurgaon, Faridabad, Jalandhar, Kanpur, Kochi, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Pune, Trivandrum/ Thiruvananthapuram

Find a Lawyers | Consultation Chamber | Legal Help | Drafts & Deeds | India Bare Acts | Lawyers Listing | Gateway to India | Global Connections | Indian Law-Made Easy | Join as Partner | Member Sign up | Recommend to Friends | Contact Us

© copyright 2000-2009, Helplinelaw.com
About US | Terms of USE

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues or consult one of the experts online.