Home | Members Login | Members Sign up | Tell a Friend | Contact Us | Lawyers Login
 
REQUEST A LAWYERREQUEST ONLINE LEGAL HELP
(Click, for online assistance)
(10:00 AM to 5:00 PM)
(In your area for your legal help) (On your legal issue by one of our experts)
News Home       New Delhi-Mumbai-Bangalore-Chennai-Ahmedabad-Pune-Hyderabad-Vodorada-Coimbetore-Kolkata etc.

Archives

News 2007
News 2006

             Home

  Gateway to India
  Global Connections
  Consultation
  
New Laws
  Legal Helpline
  Drafts & Deeds
  Bare Acts
  Indian Law Made Easy

Indian Law Made Easy

Business/Commercial Law
Consumer Rights
Property & Real Estate
Criminal Law
Tax Laws
Marriage & Divorce
Corporate Law
Inheritance
Intellectual Property
Environmental Law
Labour Law
Adoption


INDIA BUSINESS WORLD - AUGUST (16th - 31st) 2007
The Month that was ...


INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MOVES SC AGAINST AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCED RULINGS ON TAXING ASSIGNMENT PAYMENTS

THE income-tax department has moved the Supreme Court challenging the findings of the Authority for Advanced Rulings, which had said that the foreign firms are not liable to pay tax on the assignment amount charged from their Indian subsidiaries if the contract was signed outside the country.

The quasi judicial body gave this ruling in a case concerning Swiss firm Honeywell Technologies SARL, which had received a fee from Honeywell Turbo India for supplying equipment to Tata Motors.

Solicitor general G E Vahanvati appearing for the Revenue said that the AAR ruling would have a snowballing effect as this could lead to similar innovations by foreign companies. This would deprive the Indian exchequer of legitimate taxes, said Vahanavati.

A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhan issued notice to Honeywell Technologies asking it to respond to the petition.

The AAR, on an application by the Swiss company, had early this year ruled that since the assignment contract with Honeywell Turbo was entered into in Switzerland, the assignment amount was not covered under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Honeywell group had entered into a pact with Telco (now Tata Motors) in September 2003 for supply of turbochargers for its passenger car. The group later transferred its rights and interests in the Indian business to its 100% subsidiary Honeywell Turbo for 7.5 million euros.

According to Revenue, the AAR was wrong in holding that Honeywell had no business connection in India and the assignment fee was a consideration received in lieu of transfer of these rights and interest to the Indian unit.

The tax department has said that AAR failed to evaluate the profit earned by Honeywell from sale of engines to Tata Motors and income to be earned from Indian operations.

Identify your Lawyer/ Advocate for legal services in India

Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Bangalore, Baroda, Chandigarh, Chennai, Coimbatore, Cochin, Delhi, Goa, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Gaziabad, Noida, Gurgaon, Faridabad, Jalandhar, Kanpur, Kochi, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Pune, Trivandrum/ Thiruvananthapuram

Find a Lawyers | Consultation Chamber | Legal Help | Drafts & Deeds | India Bare Acts | Lawyers Listing | Gateway to India | Global Connections | Indian Law-Made Easy | Join as Partner | Member Sign up | Recommend to Friends | Contact Us

© copyright 2000-2009, Helplinelaw.com
About US | Terms of USE

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues or consult one of the experts online.