Home | Members Login | Members Sign up | Tell a Friend | Contact Us | Lawyers Login
 
REQUEST A LAWYERREQUEST ONLINE LEGAL HELP
(Click, for online assistance)
(10:00 AM to 5:00 PM)
(In your area for your legal help) (On your legal issue by one of our experts)
News Home       New Delhi-Mumbai-Bangalore-Chennai-Ahmedabad-Pune-Hyderabad-Vodorada-Coimbetore-Kolkata etc.

Archives

News 2007
News 2006

             Home

  Gateway to India
  Global Connections
  Consultation
  
New Laws
  Legal Helpline
  Drafts & Deeds
  Bare Acts
  Indian Law Made Easy

Indian Law Made Easy

Business/Commercial Law
Consumer Rights
Property & Real Estate
Criminal Law
Tax Laws
Marriage & Divorce
Corporate Law
Inheritance
Intellectual Property
Environmental Law
Labour Law
Adoption


INDIA BUSINESS WORLD - JUNE - JULY - 2007
The Month that was ...


SUPREME COURT FORMS PANELS TO SUGGEST MEASURES AGAINST MOB VIOLENCE

TAKING a serious view of the destruction of public property across the country during agitations, the Supreme Court constituted high-powered committees to suggest measures against violent agitationists and the alleged role of TV channels in precipitating such incidents. The apex court also sought responses from the Centre, states and UTs on the issue of preventing such damage and recovering penalties from the offenders.

A bench comprising Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice P P Naolekar, however, clarified that the directions should not be seen either as infringement on a citizen's right to protest or the functional freedom enjoyed by the media under Article 19 of the Constitution. The court passed the directions after perusal of the affidavits filed by the states of Delhi, UP, Haryana and Rajasthan on the recent Gurjar violence-arising out of the issue of the community's inclusion in the Schedule Tribe category-which claimed over 30 lives.

Noting that though the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act (DPPA) was enacted in 1984, the court said "hardly 24 cases have been registered in the country during the past 27 years" which indicated that it was not being enforced strictly by the government. Referring to the complaints of the Delhi and Haryana police chiefs that the violence during the protest escalated due to adverse media coverage, the court said "we do not prima facie agree with the stand."

However, the court also said there should not be any occasion for a grievance that violence has escalated due to any irresponsible coverage by the media. Hence, the court said it was appointing two committees to examine all the facets of the issue.

The first committee shall examine the modalities to be adopted to make the PDPPA (Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act) more effective and also suggest suitable changes and alterations which can make the statute more meaningful. It would be headed by retired Supreme Court judge Justice K T Thomas and include former CBI director K Raghavan, senior advocate K Parasaran and officers of the ministries of home affairs and law and justice, who are not below the rank of additional secretaries.

The second committee to examine measures for recovering damages from offenders indulging in destruction of public and private property would be headed by prominent legal expert Fali S Nariman and include 'editors-in-chief' of The Times of India, The Indian Express and NDTV chief Prannoy Roy, besides additional secretary level officers of the I&B ministry and home affairs.

Solicitor-general G E Vahanvati would be the convenor of both the committees while amicus curaie (court officer) and senior counsel Rajeev Dhawan will be a member in the two committees.

According to the court, if any person wants to assist the committees s/he shall approach Mr. Dhawan or Mr. Vahanvati for the purpose. The court which issued notices to the Centre and the states on frequent destruction of public and private property by agitators, asked them to file details of the cases tried so far under the Act.

The bench asked the states to file within three weeks their views and suggestions on the Act to make the statute more "meaningful and effective." The two committees would submit their reports to the apex court before November 15, 2007, the bench said.

Identify your Lawyer/ Advocate for legal services in India

Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Bangalore, Baroda, Chandigarh, Chennai, Coimbatore, Cochin, Delhi, Goa, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Gaziabad, Noida, Gurgaon, Faridabad, Jalandhar, Kanpur, Kochi, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Pune, Trivandrum/ Thiruvananthapuram

Lawyers Directory // Consultation Chamber // Legal Helpline // Live Help // Drafts & Deeds // Bare Acts // Virtual Office // Gateway to India // Global Connections // New Laws // Indian Law-Made Easy //Join as Partner // Member Sign up // Recommend to Friends // Link Exchange // About Us // Contact Us

© copyright 2000-2003, Helplinelaw.com
About Helplinelaw.com     Terms of USE

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues or consult one of the experts online.

Member Indianet Services
Helplinelaw.com Legal solutions in 46 cities across India Indastro.com Vedic astrology website
Indianastrology2000.com Indian / Hindu astrology website Indianetconsultants.com Indian law, Bare acts website
Website.helplinelaw.com New website package for lawyers & law firms Vedic.indastro.com Vedic astrology website
Astrology.indastro.com Daily, monthly, annual horoscope Babynames.indastro.com Baby Names
News.helplinelaw.com legal, business, economic news updates indian astrology astrology, horoscope, forecast etc.