COURTS
RULE TO PROTECT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
In a civil copyright
infringement case, the Delhi high court awarded Rs 19.75 lakh
as damages to the leading software seller Microsoft earlier
this year.
The court penalised
two parties, against whom Microsoft had filed a case, for
pirating versions of Windows 98, Office 2000 and Visual Studio
6.0, and illegally distributing it. Piracy and counterfeiting
is not uncommon in the technology world. In many markets across
the globe, companies constantly wage a battle to flush out
counterfeit and pirated products. As the local demand for
technology products shoots up, the sales of the spurious stuff
escalates.
Executives of technology companies in India say that despite
active attempts to curb the distribution of illegal products,
fully eradicating the menace is not likely to happen soon.
The strong support of the judiciary and other concerned parties
like the police, however, is encouraging and helps in sending
warning signals to pirates and counterfeiters, they add .
Terming the verdict in their case as a landmark one, Microsoft
officials say, "The judgment is a testimony to the increasing
need for inculcating respect for intellectual property. It
is a significant step in creating extremely healthy precedents
in the IPR regime in India."
IT executives are of the view that quick legal action and
stringent punishment will deter several potential people and
firms from indulging in piracy. Rangu Salgame, country manager
India of networking equipment vendor Cisco, says that customers
most often tend to buy spurious products due to lack of awareness,
though some get attracted by the low price tag that non genuine
products don. The Indian legal system fully supports and protects
the intellectual property rights of companies and there is
considerable support from the judiciary, he says.
In a recent judgment,
the Delhi high court passed an injunction refraining a few
hardware dealers from selling counterfeit Cisco products.
In Cisco's case it was not counterfeit Cisco branded router
or switch box that was sold, but add cards that are used in
the router. Salgame says that this is an early trace of counterfeited
Cisco modules and it is not a pervasive problem for the company.
"There is no need to panic. We have taken appropriate
steps," he added. The high court ruling in Cisco case
will send strong signals to all existing and future counterfeiters,
he adds. Many technology companies now have a special team
in place to identify and initiate action against pirates and
counterfeiters. Cisco, for example, has a brand protection
team whose job is to take ongoing, proactive, concerted and
company-wide effort to minimise the potential for long-term
damage to the Cisco brand as a result of counterfeiting.
Legal professionals
such as Pravin Anand of Anand & Anand, advocates, say
that the counterfeiting issues have assumed epidemic proportions.
The percentage of goods that are spurious varies across industries.
According to Anand, there has been a bunch of actions in which
punitive and exemplary damages have been granted by the Delhi
High court. These include cases filed by companies like Microsoft,
Adidas and Time Magazine. Damages ranging from Rs 15 lakh
to Rs 25 lakh have been obtained, he says.
As an example, he says that Nasscom, the trade body for software
and services vendor obtained Rs 16 lakh as compensation in
a phishing case against a company that was masquerading as
Nasscom on the Internet to obtain personal data from professionals
for its head hunting activities.
Anand says that slapping a stiff penalty will act as a deterrent.
Judges have become extremely alert and in most cases are highly
knowledgeable about IP issues. "They have developed a
positive approach and attitude to the utility of IP and the
time is not far when India would be an IP superpower,"
he predicts.
Nasscom president Kiran Karnik says that it is encouraging
to note that the Indian judiciary takes note of the problem
and is initiating appropriate action. Nasscom is working on
a regular basis to train the police and the judiciary in enforcing
IPR laws, and is also conducting numerous anti-piracy raids
and other campaigns across the country.
A recent BSA-IDC study says that a reduction in piracy from
the 70% level in 2002 to 60% by 2006 will add $2 billion to
India's economy, increase local industry revenues by around
$1.6 billion, generate 48,435 new high-tech, high-wage jobs
and generate $92.4 million in tax revenues for the government.