Home | Members Login | Members Sign up | Tell a Friend | Contact Us | Lawyers Login
 
REQUEST A LAWYERREQUEST ONLINE LEGAL HELP
(Click, for online assistance)
(10:00 AM to 5:00 PM)
(In your area for your legal help) (On your legal issue by one of our experts)
News Home       New Delhi-Mumbai-Bangalore-Chennai-Ahmedabad-Pune-Hyderabad-Vodorada-Coimbetore-Kolkata etc.

Archives

News 2007
News 2006

             Home

  Gateway to India
  Global Connections
  Consultation
  
New Laws
  Legal Helpline
  Drafts & Deeds
  Bare Acts
  Indian Law Made Easy

Indian Law Made Easy

Business/Commercial Law
Consumer Rights
Property & Real Estate
Criminal Law
Tax Laws
Marriage & Divorce
Corporate Law
Inheritance
Intellectual Property
Environmental Law
Labour Law
Adoption


INDIA BUSINESS WORLD - APRIL 16th - MAY 10th - 2008


STATUS QUO IN MAHARASHTRA LAND CASE: SC

The Supreme Court has asked the Maharashtra government to maintain status quo on its decision on notifying land, including areas near the Borivli National Park, as reserved forest. This comes as a reprieve to thousands of the families living in the colonies built on a vast tract of land stretching on such area of approximately 9,193 acres, the families dependent on the factories functioning there, and the premier institutions like Bhabha Atomic Research Centre and the ESIS Hospital located on land proposed to be notified as reserved forest.

A bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice MK Sharma ordered status quo till August 22, the next date of hearing.

The court asked the appellant developers––Godrej & Boyce, Nanabhai Jeejeebhoy, Atithi Builders, Normal Lifestyle and Nirmal Developers––not to create any third party rights in respect of flats built by them in the classified area. The court passed the order after Solicitor General G E Vahanvati on behalf of the state government assured that no further action would be taken in pursuant to the Bombay High Court judgement that held approximately 9,193 acres and 37 gunthas of such land situated within the municipal limits of Greater Mumbai as private forests.

The developers said the High Court had failed to appreciate that the notice as published in the Government gazette was neither dated, signed, sealed nor was dispatched to them. The High Court was in error in holding that the publication of the notice in the Official Gazette ‘presupposes’ the issuance of the notice,” Godrej & Boyce stated. While stating that it was necessary to establish that the lands possessed the natural attributes of a forest, real estate companies said permission for nonforest activities and construction for residential quarters was granted several decades ago and the lands were designated under the Development Plans of 1967 and 1981 for ‘residential use.’

Identify your Lawyer/ Advocate for legal services in India

Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Bangalore, Baroda, Chandigarh, Chennai, Coimbatore, Cochin, Delhi, Goa, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Gaziabad, Noida, Gurgaon, Faridabad, Jalandhar, Kanpur, Kochi, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Pune, Trivandrum/ Thiruvananthapuram

Find a Lawyers | Consultation Chamber | Legal Help | Drafts & Deeds | India Bare Acts | Lawyers Listing | Gateway to India | Global Connections | Indian Law-Made Easy | Join as Partner | Member Sign up | Recommend to Friends | Contact Us

© copyright 2000-2009, Helplinelaw.com
About US | Terms of USE

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues or consult one of the experts online.