Home | Members Login | Members Sign up | Tell a Friend | Contact Us | Lawyers Login
 
REQUEST A LAWYERREQUEST ONLINE LEGAL HELP
(Click, for online assistance)
(10:00 AM to 5:00 PM)
(In your area for your legal help) (On your legal issue by one of our experts)
News Home       New Delhi-Mumbai-Bangalore-Chennai-Ahmedabad-Pune-Hyderabad-Vodorada-Coimbetore-Kolkata etc.

Archives

News 2007
News 2006

             Home

  Gateway to India
  Global Connections
  Consultation
  
New Laws
  Legal Helpline
  Drafts & Deeds
  Bare Acts
  Indian Law Made Easy

Indian Law Made Easy

Business/Commercial Law
Consumer Rights
Property & Real Estate
Criminal Law
Tax Laws
Marriage & Divorce
Corporate Law
Inheritance
Intellectual Property
Environmental Law
Labour Law
Adoption


INDIA BUSINESS WORLD - JANUARY 16th - JANUARY 31st - 2008


BOMBAY HIGH COURT RULES NEGATIVE COVENANT IN YUVRAJ-PERCEPT CONTRACT UNENFORCEABLE

Cricketer Yuvraj Singh has got a reprieve from the Bombay High Court as it dismissed a plea filed by the Percept Talent Management Pvt Ltd seeking to restrain the all-rounder from signing any contract with any other company regarding advertisement rights.

Percept had moved the High Court after Yuvraj opted not to respond to its offers to renew the contract, which ended in October last year and was on the verge of signing contract with Globosports India. Though Percept has initiated arbitration proceedings against Yuvraj, it had sought interim relief by way of restraining orders from the High Court. But, when a single judge bench dismissed its plea, Percept had moved a division bench against the order.

The divison bench, comprising Chief Justice Swatantra Kumar and Justice J P Deodhar, today confirmed the order of the single judge and dismissed the appeal.

It was contended by Percept that persuant to a clause incorporated in the contract agreement with Yuvraj, it had the right of first choice and the cricketer could not negotiate or sign a contract with any other company regarding media, advertisements and related activities.

But, while approving single judge's order, the division bench today observed that the negative covenant in the Contract Agreement was not enforceable beyond term of the contract and therefore granting interim relief to the company was out of question.

Identify your Lawyer/ Advocate for legal services in India

Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Bangalore, Baroda, Chandigarh, Chennai, Coimbatore, Cochin, Delhi, Goa, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Gaziabad, Noida, Gurgaon, Faridabad, Jalandhar, Kanpur, Kochi, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Pune, Trivandrum/ Thiruvananthapuram

Find a Lawyers | Consultation Chamber | Legal Help | Drafts & Deeds | India Bare Acts | Lawyers Listing | Gateway to India | Global Connections | Indian Law-Made Easy | Join as Partner | Member Sign up | Recommend to Friends | Contact Us

© copyright 2000-2009, Helplinelaw.com
About US | Terms of USE

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues or consult one of the experts online.